Executive Officer Chief Executive Officers - 1692 Words

Chief Executive Officers (which will be referred to as CEOs for the remainder of this paper) is arguably the most prestigious position an individual can hold in the business world. There is no disputing the high level of responsibility necessary to manage the operations and resources of any company, while also being the key figure between the company’s board of directors and the stakeholders which are effected as a result of the company’s actions. Despite the high level of responsibility, it is worth asking a question that has been up for debate not just in recent years, but for the past several decades, which is whether or not CEO compensation can be justified? Just to put into perspective how much one of Canada’s highest-paid CEOs makes,†¦show more content†¦The short answer is no. I firmly believe that today’s CEOs are overpaid as a result of the use of stock options as a pay initiative; rewarding CEOs with huge severance packages regardless of whether they bring success to the company or not; and because they are essentially overpaid managers Stock Options are one of the Main Culprits for Overcompensation of CEOs If we break down how CEOs are generally paid we may look at their base salary, which can range from approximately $300,000 upwards to between 4 and 5 million for Canada’s top executives. What the average person may not be informed about is the additional compensation that is available to be earned from bonuses, stock options, and other payments on top of the base salary. Canada’s Highest earning CEO in 2015, Gerald W. Schwartz of Onex Corporation, made $86.5 Million of his total $87.9 Million salary from other such forms of compensation. Stock options are typically used as a form of compensation because they offer the CEO an incentive laden form of salary that in theory will make the CEO make decisions in the best interest of the shareholders, and if share prices go up they too are rewarded. Stock options are truly a no-lose situation for the CEO, because they are not required to pay for the options and in the event of share price

Analysis Of Michael Ogbeidi s The First Republic

Michael Ogbeidi recounts that ‘the First Republic under the leadership of Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, the Prime Minister, and Nnamdi Azikwe, the President, was marked by widespread grand corruption’. Ogbeidi maintains that ‘government officials looted public funds with impunity. Federal Representative and Ministers flaunted their wealth with reckless abandon†¦ Politically, the thinking of the First Republic Nigerian leadership class was based on politics for material gain; making money and living well’. The immediate civilian regime after independence did not last long. Grand corruption was pervasive with records of abuse of office, personal material aggrandisement, kickbacks, nepotism, awarding contracts to front companies, lodging†¦show more content†¦Ogbeidi argues that ‘the 1966 coup was a direct response to the corruption of the First Republic’. For Effeh, ‘it follows that the ideals for economic emancipation- the supposed inspiration behind the quest for independence- has become the subject of escapist antics, grandiloquent rhetoric, and/or outright buffoonery’. However, amidst all this rhetoric, people seemed to overlook the complexities within the system that nourished and sustained the unwavering wind of grand corruption and rather greater emphasis was laid on its manifestations and consequences as will be depicted in the speeches of succeeding military regimes as will be analysed in the next section ( section 2.4). 2.4 Grand Corruption (The Nigerian Military Connection) Research indicates that the military played very prominent roles in sustaining grand corruption in Nigeria as ‘corruption, already bourgeoning under the early politicians, became entrenched under the military rule’. Military coups forcefully circumvent democratic institutions and because of their illegitimacy, it can be argued that the track records of the military portend that they had little regard over the well-being and welfare of the populace and as such pursued no mandate of accountability and transparency towards the people. The military rulers were able to perpetrate their

Ratcatcher in Kindertransport free essay sample

The character of the Ratcatcher plays an important role in the play â€Å"Kindertransport† by Diane Samuels, not just as an antagonist but as a vital symbol in the play’s context. During these pages, Eva’s mother, Helga is reading Eva’s favorite book about the pied piper of Hamlin. But also, during this scene there is cross cutting between Helga reading the book and Faith (Evelyn’s Daughter) also reading the same book, but in a different setting. The Ratcatcher in this scene is portrayed as an evil and dark mysterious figure, whose ultimate plan is not immediately recognised, but towards the end of the scene, the Ratcatcher is the embodiment and symbol of separation, as the scene moves into another short scene which depicts Eva finally on the Kindertransport leaving her family and heading for a new life in England. This scene also depicts some actual accounts of the Kindertransport, as some children and parents alike thought that living in England would only be a short term arrangement as Eva states ‘see you in England’. We will write a custom essay sample on Ratcatcher in Kindertransport or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This is also dramatic irony as the audience knows that not all children were reunited with their families. Throughout the plot of â€Å"Kindertransport†, the Ratcatcher takes the form of other characters in the play, such as the Nazi guard on the train. In this scene, Eva is sitting on the train too petrified to move. This is ironic as the Ratcatcher is the personification of Evelyn/Eva’s fear and at that moment in the play, the audience would expect that a child of Eva’s age would be scared about leaving their family behind. The stage directions in this scene describe the emotion of Eva as being terrified and scared. This scene also shows what the Nazi supporters thought of the Jews as being scum as the officer takes Eva’s luggage and dumps it all on the train floor and draws a huge Star of David on her label. He also throws a sweet for Eva on the floor showing that he thinks he is of a higher standard than the Jewish children. The third time that the Ratcatcher appears in the play is when Eva has arrived in England and is being held in a sort of hostel. But in this scene, the Ratcatcher is not as terrifying to Eva as in the previous scenes. However in this scene the Ratcatcher is a bearer of bad news as he has told Eva her English family have not arrived. This is also dramatic irony as many people who are in the audience will know that some of the children aboard the Kindertransport did not get homes or the homes the children did find were not emotionally friendly. Another character that the Ratcatcher possesses is the postman. Now the postman is a character which embodies the views of most English people at the time, as many people where disrespectful or unaware of the backgrounds the children came from. An example of this is when the postman makes Eva salute Hitler. However, Eva is unaware what the postman is doing to her but still she plays along to what the man says. There is also another example of dramatic irony here as the postman says â€Å"thought he’d (Hitler) done wonderful things for your country†. But as the audience are aware Hitler was a mass murderer. The last character that the Ratcatcher embodies during the play is the train station guard. This character mainly embodies the suspicious views that Britons had about the German population, but he also shares traits with the postman. During this scene, the Ratcatcher is the full embodiment of Eva’s fear of being deported from her new found country. This scene contains a lot of interrogatives. This is a comparison between this and actual interrogations that the Nazi’s did on the Jewish people. In conclusion, the Ratcatcher is an omnipresent antagonist throughout the play. He embodies characters that have different social views based upon people’s thoughts and feelings of that time. He is Eva/Evelyn’s fear of separation and loss.

Cat in the rain analyses free essay sample

Cat in the rain analisis The story, which has been chosen for linguistic analysis, belongs to Ernest Hemingway, one of the most famous American novelists. The story tells us about a young american married couple,who came to Italy for vacation. As it was rainyoutside the couple had to stay in the hotel room for the whole day. The story is told in the 3rd person narrative. The text of the story is not homogenues. The description is interlaced with descriptive passages and dialogues of the personages. The author uses simple short narrative sentences to show the abrupt relations of the yong ouple. Hemingway doenst mention the vacation country where the couple stays, the reader realises it due to the dialogue of the american girl with service team of the hotel. Ha perduto qualque cosa, Signora? There was a cat, said the American girl. There is also no preface to the story,the reader doesnt know anything of the past life of the american couple. We will write a custom essay sample on Cat in the rain analyses or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The story starts with the description of the hotel. And it seems to be quite cosy but the picture of the rainy day hels the reader to realise that the conflict is growing step by step. The author also mentions the war monument hat ca nbe seen out of the hotel room window to show the after war time. The author makes extensive use of repetitions to render the story more vivid, convincing, more real and emotional. For example the use of the word rain with a number of phrases associating it, such as puddles, deserted square, glistening war monument. The author also applies repetition to reveal the relationship of the girl to the old hotel owner (she liked , she liked ). As the verb to like is not used to characterize relations of the wife to her husband, this contrast is full of the concealed but easily ead meaning. And also parallel constructions It was made of bronze and glistened in the rain. It was raining. The rain dripped from the palm trees. Water stood in pools on the gravel paths. The sea broke in a long line in the rain and slipped back down the beach to come up and break again in a long line in the rain. The motor cars were gone from the square by the war monument The use of the word empty,when the author shortly describes a street,makes feel even more lonely and unsetteling. The climax of the story begins when the american girl sees a cat in the rain. A small cat tries to hide from the rain under the table. The girl feels such a pity to the poor creature that she wants to take it to the room. The cat in the rain symbolizes the girl itself she is definetely unhappy with her marriage and her husband doesnt love her. She wants a different life to the one she has. And she is keeping repeating it to her husband l want to pull my hair back tight and smooth and make a big knot at the back that I can feel, she said. l want to have a kitty to sit on my lap and purr when I stroke her. And I want to eat at a table with my own silver and I ant candles. And I want it to be spring and I want to brush my hair out in front of a mirror and I want a kitty and I want some new clothes. But he is only irretated with her words and tells her to shut up,that shows how deeply indifferent he is to her feelings. The wife needs this comfort,home feeling and she gets desperate when she says that if she cannt have long hair and silver and candles but she st ill can have a window. Exactly like it is in her life she got married but got only a substitution of the real married couple life.