'Hammurabi’s Code\r'

'Danielle Raskin declination 20, 2012 â€Å"If a man strikes the slave lady friend of a free man and causes her to support the fruit of her womb, he shall pay devil shekels of silver. ” A non slave would be paid ten shekels of silver. Isn’t that unfair? Hammurabi was the king of Babylonia in the eighteenth century B. C. E. He is genuinely important. He wrote one of the world’s oldest sets of howevernesss, which right off is studied by many people.I tactile property Hammurabi’s code is unjust because of its office laws, Family laws, and Personal-Injury laws. I telephone the family laws in Hammurabi’s code atomic number 18 unjust. Law 148 states that, â€Å"If a man has married a wife and a disease has seized her, if he is goaded to link a second wife, he shall marry her. He shall not divorcement the wife whom the disease has seized. She shall dwell in the theater they have built together, and he shall maintain her as long as she liv es. I think this law is unfair because a man shouldn’t drop dead his wife to die and also marry an new(prenominal) woman while the other is dying. I think the property laws in Hammurabi’s Code are unjust. I find law 21 undischarged and unfair. â€Å"If a man has broken through the wall (to rob) a house, they shall put him to shoemakers last and pierce him, or hang him in the hole in the wall which he has made. ” I move into’t coincide with this law for two reasons. First, this punishment is substance too harsh.If someone robs a house now, they wouldn’t be put to terminal; they would just be put in jail. My final reason is that I don’t think that the robber should be killed in the house that he robbed. I wouldn’t want anyone being hung or pierced in my house. I think the personal-injury laws in Hammurabi’s Code are unjust. Law 218 states, â€Å"If a operating surgeon has operated with a bronze lancet on a free man for a dependable injury, and has caused his death,… his hands shall be knap off. ” This law doesn’t seem right.If a surgeon has operated and the person operated dies, I don’t think the surgeons hands should get cut off. Instead, the surgeon can be laboured to take a break as a surgeon until he is touch on to come back. In conclusion, most of Hammurabi’s Code is unjust. From cutting people’s hands off to hanging and bang-up them, these laws are very harsh. Hammurabi was a very strict ruler. I think Hammurabi’s Code is unjust. From the laws I have mentioned, what do you think? Is Hammurabi’s Code just or unjust?\r\n'