'Source of Congressional Power\r'

'In the United States’ system of governance, thither is a checks and balances system where power is shared go forth by the executive come apart, the judicial dissever and the legislative leg. To a great point the legislative branch (the congress) exists to provide caution of the executive branch. In other ways, congressional power can be instead extensive as visible in a number of famous judicatory results where such power was challenged and the end dissolver of the court cases resulted non in a lessoning of congressional power, hardly an affirmation and refinement of it.Examples of famous court cases that involve congressional power include McCullough vs. Maryland (the piece grants sexual congress the major power to carry out the constitution when the function of the national government is concerned); South Carolina vs. Katzenback (the authority of coition to deliver the Voting Rights Act was upheld); Gibbons vs. Ogden (Congress’ powers under the t ransaction Clause of the Constitution were upheld); and McGrain vs. Doherty (inherent powers outlined)Of all its powers, Congress is most notable for the ability to settle and maintain interstate (and foreign) commerce, write tax revenue law, declare war and fund the military, endure nominations to the federal court and even summon the chairwoman if he breaks the law (or favor to ignore the fact that he skint the law) While some may wrongfully argue that such powers lead to a long, bureaucratic process that could be a lot better served it were streamlined by a central authority, the fact that Congress prevents the ontogeny of a central authority is its greatest asset.That is to say, by not allowing the executive branch to develop stupefying power, the Congress eliminates the President from emerging as a lordly figure who is not overmaster to oversight. If as well much power is placed in the hands of any one branch of government, then the ability of the government to get a nd become corrupt is a very(prenominal) real possibility. Congress keeps this system of checks and balances in line. The expansion of Congressional power in addition exists to greatly help the stack. For example, South Carolina vs.Katzenback change integrity the power of the Voting Rights Act and allowed people to maintain their ability to exercise their right wing to vote. The control of commerce as defined by McCullough vs. Maryland held production linees accountable and did not give them free reign to do whatever it is they wished at the detriment of hunting lodge as a whole. Yes, there tolerate been numerous complaints over the years that Congress has overreached its authority and regulated/interfered in business and private lives beyond what is appropriate; but such overreaching has been curtailed in the olden when public outcry became loud and virulent.As such, it would be hard to press a case that Congressional Power is abusive or overreaching since Congress does, ult imately, have to be accountable to its constituency every election cycle. Because of this, the ability to exercise power remains in check and can not overreach beyond what the population wishes. So, in that regard, congressional power is not unlimited and is subject to the same checks and balances system that the other part of government are subject.\r\n'