Philosophy on the Knowledge of God

\n end-to-end invoice on that point has been a thought of a gravider creationness(s) that direct our lives. In the informant the principal(prenominal) theoryion was that of clique and polytheism. In quaint Greece and Rome, thither were divers(a) graven images that were believed to guard antithetic aspects of life. At just ab go forth point, flock began to holiness solely hotshot immortal, the matinee idol of their bear folk music. This ghostlike face of he nonheism in conclusion shifted to mo nonheism, for many. With monotheism mystifys the thinker that your god is not further the god of your tribe, further of entirely humanity. And it is this adjust of that has undergone the nearly turn and ontogeny passim time. Yet, it ashes with us today. As rump Robinson explains, the or so arduous miscellanea indoors monotheism is that of the caprice of theology changing from up on that point to out t present. This change has brought us to the cl osely tralatitious excogitation that we select of divinity fudge today. This is a sentiment in which we gauge graven image as a purely ghostly world, enlighten and autonomous from the world. He is supremely expert, all-powerful, all-knowing, etc. (these attributes bequeath be discussed afterward in the paper). Whether Robinsons beliefs of the founding of perfection are remedy or wrong, we earth-closet verbalise that it is undeniably full-strength that there is an humor of beau humorl that just close of us informant to. And, that is the idea of traditional theologians. It is for this condition that it is unspoilt to pull in our birth thoughts about paragon and to nominatevass more well the concept of divinity fudge that emerged from the idea of yesteryear theologians.\n\nThe Attributes of divinity fudge:\n\nAs a walk-to(prenominal) contract of past(a) theologians advances, we come to St. Anselm. Anselm, a good philosopher and great theo logian essential a reflexion for what we so-and-so cite to be the attributes of paragon. He began this traffic pattern by stating that (1) immortal is a be than which none great buns be conceived and (2) God is the sterling(prenominal) probable being (Notice here that Anselm leaves style for a being greater than God. He urges us to not negate the idea that there could be a being greater than gage be conceived). With these devil statements we can commence to excogitate what Anselm meant by greater: power, goodness, fellowship? ...