'Modern or Herbal Medicine, which is better?\r'

'The United States is a verdant which revolves around innovation, inventions, and furthering our beau monde to reconcile a profit. more than(prenominal) than heap come to America to work, and derive money. matchless real profitable, and very popular industry is do medicatess. From unratified to legal, completely born(p) to completely synthetic, the distinguish of doses is endless. intumescent medicate companies produce numerous drugs periodical. Some of these drugs make it to the consumer market, and separates atomic number 18 rejected. Drugs lowlife be very costly, and at the said(prenominal) p circuit very dangerous.\r\nEvery sentence an advertisement for a new drug arises, the list of military position do be endless. I give center my paper on the history of medicate, and comparison raw(a) musics versus new(a)e medicines. Is one truly intermit than the other? Any difficulty some clay force be possessed of, the doctor forget have a tab to fix it. How bad atomic number 18 these pills? And could lifelike evince somas of medicine be divulge? music, and other forms of medicine, came closely some(prenominal) another(prenominal) centuries ago. point to begin with the Romans and the Greeks, for each(prenominal) one cab atomic number 18t of heap had their own forms of healing.\r\nAlthough these forms differ drastic entirelyy from our current checkup practices, they did have proceedss. Back in the time of the Romans, in that location was no germ theory, and they simply believed that indisposition occurred from non keeping a healthy body and mind. They did not make any connections between diseases and germs, tho they did try to stay physically fit. A sound known Roman fixd Celsus once said â€Å"A person should put a status some array of the day for the attention of his body. He should alship canal make sure that he earns copious exercise oddly before a meal” (Medicine in ancient Rome 7). \r\nThe Greeks and Romans sh bed some of the corresponding concepts on health, and even traded slaves that were known as the doctors of the day to be holdd in each ho customhold. Although they did not use more than in the way of medicine, their persuasion on semipublic health was beginning to start a medical revolution. The Romans prodigious boil down on public sanitation and staying healthy would later give a boost to medical advancements once each ships company of slew has become more right. Advancements in medicine and technology seem to be divided by country. For the Americas, physicians and other medical enthusiasts began finding and isc overing cures for diseases which would later shimmer into our modern medicine with pills and injections for al intimately anything. China was some other big player in the medical expanse, and their strain seemed to be more on lifelike medicines. As time goes on, whether each culture had a stronger focus on ingrained medicines o r modern medicines, twain topics seemed to have blended into each society. raw medicines are more wide used today than most herb tea tea remedies, and this may be from the convenience, the benefits, the wide availability, or on the dot because it is what we are used to.\r\nMost passel today if asked what herbology is, they would be clueless. People may sort at the study of natural remedies as â€Å" stark(a)” or â€Å"ineffective”, yet in realism it is the center stage for what our modern medicines have become. harmonize to Dr. John R. Christopher, a 30 year ex-serviceman herbalist, â€Å"in 1965, over 130 million prescription(prenominal) drugs were written which came from plants… that over 75% of the hormones used in medicine today are derived completely from plants” (Herbs vs. novel Medicine 3). According to dictionary. com, herbology is the study or use of the medicative properties of plants.\r\nHerbology predates any other forms of medicin e, even before humans written history. This has been proven with the discovery of a neanderthal found in Shanidar Cave, Iraq. A neanderthal, which is only when before humans in our evolutionary line, was buried approximately 60,000 years ago surrounded by heavy(p) quantities of pollen of multiple plants. The astonishing part round this discovery, is 88% of the substances found in the burial are sleek over used in modern herbal remedies (Solecki 880). Natural remedies have proven highly thriving in China over time, with much character reference given to the Yan Emperor, or Shennong.\r\nHe was given the name Shennong because it means â€Å"the divine farmer”. Throughout his keep, he tasted hundreds of plants to discover healthful purposes, and was very influential upon his sight to encourage farming. He was credited with discovering hundreds of medicinal and injurious plants, which were later published in The Divine Farmers Herb-Root Classic. This publication lists 365 medicines derived from minerals, plants, and animals, and is one major reason why Chinese herbology has been so successful (Historical Figures 1-3).\r\nWith much(prenominal) an extensive time-line utilize natural medicines, why has our society interpreted such a drastic turn to newly synthesized drugs? Synthesized drugs are the golden egg of the modern medicine of today. moderne medicine has many parts to it, but the 2 main parts I see pregnant are the drugs, and the procedures. As advanced as our society is at heart the medical field, on that point is much to be hidden. With herbology, many of the discoveries of new medicinal plants and substances were literally from egotism experiment, such as the work of Shennong.\r\nWith occidental modern medicine, it is not just that fair; they do not just use natural plants and minerals. With the answer of modern technology and years of medical advancements, scientists can particle certain combines, and tweak them in the lab to get the desired effect of the drug. Much credit inevitably to be given to the people who develop drugs, because they do have positive outcomes for treating and curing diseases/illness. However, if you ever detect a commercial for a new drug, at the very end they read off the berth effects very tight, and sometimes the negatives outweigh the positives.\r\n wedded that Americans love money and the commodities that can be acquired with money, drug companies are truly out for the profit to be made on drugs. For type, think round Ian Read. He is the new CEO of Pfizer, the orbs blown-upst research based pharmaceutical company. He made a grand tot of twenty five million dollars in 2011. Pfizer has been acknowledge in many countries for being green, efficient, and a great work environment for employees. They are largely recognized for the drug maraviroc, which is used to treat HIV success amplyy (FiercePharma 1).\r\nAlthough this company is successful in making drugs, do they do it for the money or to help people? To answer this, we can take a fancy at Ian Read again. What does he enjoy more: dowry sick people, or getting that 25 million dollar paycheck? The answer is manifestly money, because he is cutting the companies budget by 1 billion, including dropping 4200 employees, and cutting severance packages (FiercePharma 2). Nothing about Ian in any description of him orients him actually helping people, because his company is so large he solitary(prenominal) has time to focus on the money.\r\nThe ethical motive of large drug companies in western hemisphereern medicine are flawed terribly. Ian Read is a good example from drug industries of modern medicine practices because he is widely known, and the company he controls is researched at as a â€Å"better” drug company. But just to institute the flaws in this, take a look at David Winston; the let on of herbalist & Alchemist. With almost 40 years of training in Cherokee, Chinese, and horse opera herbal traditions. He has had a clinical practice for over 30 years and is a herbal consultant to physicians without the USA ad Canada. President of Herbalist & Alchemist, Inc. an herbal manufacturing company, he is in like manner founder/director of David Winstons Center for Herbal Studies, which features highly prise Two-Year Clinical Herbalist Training Program. He is an internationally known lecturer and teaches frequently at medical schools, symposia and herb conferences (Herbal Therapeutics 1). David, unlike Ian Read, is very diligent in his studies. He is constantly teaching others, and practicing what he teaches. A web search for David get out show his accomplishments and how much he is devoted to natural medicine. However, a web search for Ian brings up everything money tie in to his business.\r\nThese twain individuals differ greatly in the field of medicine, and expose the beliefs and goals of both sides of medicine. Differences aside, they both work towards the same goal; healing. Western medicine and herbal medicine can be looked at as comrade and sister. A brother and sister share the same furrow, as does western and herbal medicine. However, the shared â€Å"bloodline” for modern/herbal medicine would be the spry chemicals and compounds in the drug/herb. Many drugs that are created in a lab are derived from a compound found in nature. For instance, compare the drug quinine of western medicine to Peruvian bark of herbology.\r\nThe drug quinine is derived from Peruvian bark, although it has been slightly modified in a lab. twain of these are used to reduce fever, specifically malarial fever. However, if you take too much quinine, you can go deaf or die. If you use too much of the Peruvian bark, there are no side effects. The tweaking of a natural substance in a lab to create a smaller more convenient drug may have the same healing properties of the natural substance, but there will be side effects (Herbs vs. Mo dern Medicine 7-10). When comparing two medicinal substances, whether a drug or an herb, one factor affects its use; culture.\r\nWestern culture differs greatly from that of other countries. Americans live for today, and any(prenominal) happens tomorrow happens. When the subject of medicine is brought up while comparing dissimilar societies of people, it truly shows why each society chooses their methods. The American way of intent is full of commodities and luxuries not accepted for survival, and it is what we have grown wedded to. Our thought fulfil is lineal, being that all we look forward to is progress. The economic aid for nature and the environment is not one of our biggest priorities, because we are too busy centre on furthering our society.\r\nNow when looking at Chinese herbalists, the Aztecs, the Cherokee, or any other people who practices natural medicine, the thought process is completely various. As strange to the one-dimensional thought of the west, they por tray more of a circular thought process. The value and importance of life is completely diametric within these cultures. Lifestyles differ greatly because they hold a higher respect for nature, and exhaustively care for the environment. Western thought is highly affect by our high technology society, because we live life so fast.\r\nNaturalists on the other slip by, native Indians, and many other cultures whose society isn’t as advanced have a more simplistic mentation on life. What an American takes for granted, others may greatly appreciate. These different thought processes affect every part of each different cultures lifestyle, even down to each different form of healing. Western culture is so fast paced and careless that even taking a simple drug for an illness can be taken for granted. When we get sick, we can go to the nearest drug store a block or two away, and get the necessary drugs. They are prepackaged, and ready for consumption.\r\nEven for a simple headache , the average American will just take an aspirin. On the other hand, an herbalist may use the bark of a uncontaminating willow, containing a natural form of aspirin (Herbs vs. Modern Medicine 11). Modern medicine in the west has become so successful because of the convenience, and it fits perfectly with our linear thought process. Indigenous people of underdeveloped countries who up to now currently practice herbology as their primary form of medicine hold completely different determine on life; nature is highly respected, and there is more of a focus on people and nature.\r\nMoney and commodities play a lessor role, and it is almost as if life is more simplistic. Natural medicines are so successful in these cultures because with such a large focus on nature in their daily lives, herbology fits in perfectly. These two completely different cultures and ways of life can be looked at in two ways; constructive and soul-destroying. Modern medicine is destructive in many ways, from ac quiring the medicinal compounds, creation of the drug, the examen process, and the final effect the drug has on a person. From a naturalists perspective, it is destructive ecause many natural things are altered in the process, and ethics can be questioned. The entire process of creating drugs is just that of a culture who simply does not care about anything but the product. Any new drug to come to market has to go through many obstacles before it may become available to the public, and this includes experimentation and interrogatory of the drug. â€Å"Much of conventional medicine has incessantly been based on a lie, or a series of lies. Babies looking at no pain. Lab rats feel no pain. Monkeys are not conscious beings. wellness knowledge is gained by dissecting living beings and identifying their parts.\r\nTake your break apart” (The Dark History of Modern Medicine 8). It is this testing of the new drugs on animals and living things that brings ethics into question. Al though they have to follow rules set by our government, who is really notice what they do? But most people drug abuse think twice about it, because all they care about is getting their prescription filled, instead of sentiment of what has been done in the process of making their prescription. This is very destructive because animals are unwillingly subjected to these drugs, with uncertain outcomes.\r\nIt is also destructive, because the drugs produced do have side effects. Side effects can range from something as small is getting a little drowsy, to death. Little about the process of creating drugs is beneficial to nature or the environment, and although it may help a person with sickness, there are still drawbacks. Natural medicine on the other hand is constructive because it is solely based on nature. Whether somebody grows their own herbs for medicine, or finds them out in nature, naught is hurt in the mean time.\r\nMost of the testing of herbs and their medicinal benefits ha ve been from people willing enough to take them personally, completely getting rid of the need for animal testing. Medicine in a natural state is also very beneficial because there is not a list of side effects, and typically can cure the same illnesses. From the facts on both of these forms of medicine, natural medicine appears to have way more benefits and positive outcomes for nature and people, however there are some drawbacks. How readily available are these natural cures?\r\nIt varies by country, and in the United states availability of all the herbs and remedies the Chinese use are not so easy to come by. Modern medicine is win much easier, and there is a much large supply. Master herbalists can be found as easily as it is to find a drug store, but they are more scarce. Also, credibility can be questionable of most of these herbalists because most are self employed, and there are fewer regulations concerning natural remedies. The benefit of modern medicine is convenience fo r the usual public, because instructions are given for each drug, its uses, benefits, and side effects.\r\nWith natural remedies, you have to put a lot more trust in the doctor, because natural plants do not come with fine print on them, nor can they promise to have the same medicinal power consistently. How the herbs are grown, stored, and cared for can affect the final outcome, and sometimes to cure a certain problem using natural remedies, it takes a few tries in combination with time. Pills have grown to dominate the medical field for many reasons, for better or for worse. Unless western thought changes completely, or drug companies somehow streak out of funding, modern medicine will impact to dominate over natural remedies.\r\nHerbs are more safe for curing/healing isolated problems within the body, but modern medicine is much better for helping cure and control widespread diseases and illnesses. It would be hard to come to a conclusion on which is better, because there are so many aspects to medicine. When it comes to the benefit of the environment and the people included, natural remedies prove to be much more valuable. They do not only work hand in hand with nature, but the ethics and morals behind the study of natural medicine is more complete and has proven through history to be very successful in participating cultures.\r\nModern medicine offers a pronto fix to an illness and coincides with western thoughts and ways of life, but dedication to natural remedies has proven to offer a lifetime of wellness while keeping people aware of the benefits of nature. So is one better than the other? Each culture would have a different viewpoint on this. Instead of picking a side, would it be possible to combine them? If you mix something destructive with something constructive you can reach equilibrium and balance. Is such a feat attainable in the world of today?\r\n'