Jose Rizal’s Retraction Controversy Essay

The debate still continues if Dr. Jose Rizal, our national hero, re aloney repudiate? This has been the greatest controversy which is most talked ab give away Rizal. He is recognized for the novels he had written during the Spanish period. Because of these courageous acts of rebellion against the said colonizers, he became our subject field Hero. that what if our national hero, at the last moments of his life retracted everything he had ever said and written? In 1935, a letter was implant by convey Manuel Garcia. The said letter contains that Jose Rizal declared himself as a Catholic and that he retracts everything he had said, written, published and did against the Catholic Church.Opinions regarding this issue would non be the same because some whitethorn agree and some may non. There so creationy questions speculating his retraction if in the first place, all of this is what he real fought for. From Fr. Balaguers version, Rizal, on the 29th daytime of celestial latitude 1 896, wrote and signed the retraction papers in front of him and with the other Jesuit priest present at the death cell. Rizal asked for a justification doubly and for a rosary from the priest between the two confessions.In Balaguers memorandum-record, Rizal asked for a mass and a request for Holy Communion, this was readily ratified by the Jesuits and assigned Fr. Villaclara as the officiating priest of the mass inside the cell. He also mentioned that Rizal asked for the digit of the Sagrado Corazon de Jesus which he carved when he was just 14. Balaguer described the scene as heart-warming because Rizal kissed the image that he had call for from the Jesuits. While kneeling and surrounded by the religious authorities in the death cell, Rizal read the retraction document. Balaguer also claimed that in that location was a servant-messenger for Josephine pasture brake to prepare for the marriage at the San Ignacio Church where Fr.Simo will conduct the confession and other things needed for the ceremonies, which will be materialized on the morning of the 30th. Lastly, forwards the execution and in the presence of the Archbishop and the Jesuit superior Reverend Fr. Pio Pi, Rizal kissed the image of the cross presented to him and has a rosary entwined in his hand. But how did Father Balaguer convinced Rizal to be converted into Cathloic before his execution?This is one of the big unreciprocated questions of today. In addition to this, Rizal wrote a poem entitled My Last word of farewell which was written on the eve of his execution, there was a line there saying,Ill go where there are no slaves, tyrants or hangmen where creed does non kill and where immortal alone does reign (Rizal, 1896).With this, he mentioned God in this poem. Before he was executed, he wrote an undated letter to his family when he was in Fort Santiago Bury me in the ground, place a stone and a cross over it. My name, the date of my brith and of my death. Nothing more(prenominal). If you later wish to surround my grave with a fence, you may do so. No anniversaries. I prefer Paang Bundok. Now, what do he mean by this? He wanted a cross over it. He died as a Catholic and was buried inside the sacred grounds of Paco Cemetery.Unfortunately, his instructions were not granted. It was also argued that Rizal retracted in order to yet his family from further persecution, to evanesce Josephine bracken a legal status as his wife and to command reforms from the Spanish government. Speaking of Josephine as his wife, there was an article from Jose Rizal University that one day of early March 1896 Rizal played a practical joke on Josephine, which frightened her terribly. As a result, she prematurely gave birth to an eight-month child boy. The baby was very weak and can hardly breathe. With this, Rizal immediately baptized him Francisco in honor of his father. He tried to save the life of his son yet all his knowledge and skill as a physician could not save little Fran cisco.Sorrowfully, Rizal saw his child die three hours later birth then he drew a sketch of his unfounded son and he buried him under a shady point near his home. He prayed Oh, God, I give you another tiny angel. enliven bless his soul. Again, this is one proof that even before the exile in Dapitan, he practiced being a Catholic.On the other hand, the written matter of the retraction paper that was allegedly signed by Rizal that was even kept secret and was only published in newspapers. It was said that the paper was incapacitated when Rizals family requested for the original copy. Are the Jesuits too irresponsible for not knowing the importance of the document? Or was it just hidden? But 39 years later, the original copy was found in the archdiocesan archives.Ricardo Pascual Ph. D, who was given permission by the Archbishop Nozaleda to test the document and later think in his book, Rizal beyond the Grave that the papers shown was a falsification. The common contradiction in terms of this argument was either Father Balaguer or Father Pi had make errors in reproducing another copy of the original. The manuscript was also allegedly put from 1922 1935.Trinidad challenged the Jesuits to show to her the manuscripts so that she could validate that it was Rizals write and signature. With this, finding out that there were several copies of it, some may imitate Rizals handwriting and signature. Another proof that Rizal did not retract is that when Father Balaguer claimed that Jose and Josephine, however, there were no marriage certificate or public record shown that could prove Father Balaguers accounts.In addition, he performed the ceremony between 600 615 AM of December 30, 1896 with the presence of one of the Rizals sisters scarce Rizal family denied that none of them were there and Dr. Jose Rizal was martyred at 703 AM. Also, nobody had reported that Bracken was in the area of Fort Santiago in the morning of the execution. get wind also the three priest s (Fr. Jose Villaclara, Fr. Estanislao March, and Fr. Vicente Balaguer) to negotiate the expanse of the walk to give spiritual care to the condemned Dr. Jose Rizal, why is it that, only Fr. Balaguer verbalise that there was a nuptials? Furthermore, where were Fr. Villaclara and Fr. March to verify the manifestation of a marriage ceremony? Or was there really even one at all? demo the two sides, where do you stand? Do you believe that Rizal really abjured or not? Its up to you but this controversy should not snuff out Rizals works for our demesne. He awakened our knowledge of nationalism and patriotism. Jose Rizals writings helped in motivating the Filipinos to fight for our freedom against the Spanish colonizers and inspire a lot of Filipino revolutionaries to stand up for a cost. In my opinion, I still believe that his contributions to our country are far greater than the issue brought by this letter. I stick to his advocacy that war is not the solution for independence.If you re going to ask me if he really retract, I would say yes, because he really wanted to have peace and to incumbrance the chaos during that time, he abjured everything due to the pressure to his family and became a Catholic.I stated earlier that he has some requests to his family for his burial that there should be a cross over his grave, with this, he died as a Catholic and his family, on the 11th day after his death, was informed that early of the next day, a mass was to be celebrated for the eternal rest of his soul. Adding to this, he see hardships in writing his third novel entitled Makamisa because he is not fluent inFilipino language. How could he state A man who doesnt love his native language, is worse than all animals and a ill-smelling fish., if he, himself, cant apply it.And lets understand that he retracted for the sake of his familys persecution and wanted a reform for our country against the Spanish government. Im sure all of us really love our family and will do suc h extraordinary things just to save them and would love to have peace on earth. But all this and more will retract nothing from his greatness as a Filipino.